Legal Opinion

Miller v. Exchange Nat. Bank of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 1, 1938No. 27317PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Kay 'county. The Exchange National Bank of Tulsa, as-signee of a note and mortgage executed by Alma M. England to the Albright Title & Trust Company, filed its action asking judgment for $50,000, attorney’s fees and interest and foreclosure of a mortgage executed to secure payment of the note. Plaintiffs in error herein were given leave to intervene, and they filed separate petitions in intervention, asserting a vested, beneficial interest in this note by virtue of a trust agreement executed in their favor by their father. Hereafter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. CliftonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. President, Directors, & Co. of Newburgh & Cochecton Turnpike Road v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank of Mobile v. CowleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. MacFarlane v. First National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Paul v. ArvidsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Peoples National Bank of Greenville v. PedenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Wade v. McKeownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API