Warehime v. Warehime
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, J.:
¶ 1 The core issue for resolution on remand from the Supreme Court is whether the directors of a corporation can divest the majority shareholders of their voting control and vest control in themselves. We hold that they cannot.
¶ 2 The facts, as adduced at trial and taken from the trial court opinion, are as follows: Alan Warehime, the father of appellant Michael Warehime and appellee John Warehime, instituted two voting trusts in 1988 to control the majority of voting stock (Class B common stock) in Hanover Foods Corp. (HFC). Alan Ware-hime established the first trust with his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Blasius Industries, Inc. v. Atlas Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1988
- Condec Corporation v. Lunkenheimer CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967
- Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Glenn v. Kittanning Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warehime v. WarehimeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- PETOW v. WarehimeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Jewelcor Management Inc. v. Thistle Group Holdings Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2002