Legal Opinion

Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1961No. Appeals, Nos. 52 and 57PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

We are called, upon in these appeals to determine whether the defendants in a prior action brought by a shareholder are entitled to have the plaintiff in that action pay the costs and attorneys fees incurred by them in successfully defending that suit by virtue of the Act of April 18, 1945, P. L. 253, 12 PS §1321.1 In order to make this determination we must decide whether the prior action in which the present appellant was the plaintiff and the present appellees, the defendants, was a secondary or derivative suit as opposed to a direct personal or representative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Webster Eisenlohr, Inc. v. KalodnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  5. Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Warehime v. WarehimeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Hill v. OfaltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. John P. Kennedy v. Venrock AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Lipton v. News International, PlcSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  5. Fishkin v. Hi-Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API