Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 24, 2006No. 93,686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Vincent Young appeals from the trial court’s decision revolting his probation and ordering him to serve his underlying sentence. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred *108in deciding not to continue the probation revocation hearing and forcing Young to proceed pro se. K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 22-3716(b) provides defendants with the right to be represented by counsel in probation revocation proceedings. In State v. Weigand, 204 Kan. 666, 466 P.2d 331 (1970), our Supreme Court stated that when an accused has not obtained counsel by the day that the accused has been ordered to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Unwitting Victim v. C.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HameenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API