Legal Opinion
State v. Forteson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 21, 1970No. 2 CA-CR 199PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, .Judge.
In compliance with Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297, 451 P.2d 878 (1969), counsel for the appellant points out that the only possible ground for reversal might be the denial of the appellant’s motion to suppress the pistol admitted into evidence, relying on Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684,. 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961).
Briefly, the facts are as follows. Appellant was informed against on July 19, 1968, for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- State v. RadabaughCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974