Legal Opinion
Wraight v. Exchange Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1996No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Amended judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this action by plaintiff against defendant Exchange Insurance Company (Exchange) and another insurance carrier for a declaratory judgment, Exchange moved for summary judgment on the ground that its insured’s delay *917of almost 20 months in providing notice of the accident was unreasonable as a matter of law. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment on the ground that the 41-day delay of Exchange in disclaiming coverage was unreasonable as a matter of law. Supreme Court denied the motion and granted the cross motion. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- General Accident Insurance Group v. CirucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Appell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Appell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Continental Insurance v. Atlantic Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Garay v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Spears v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003