Legal Opinion

Metoyer v. Chassman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 26, 2007No. 04-56179PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

504 F.3d 919 (2007)

Patricia Heisser METOYER, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant,

v.

Leonard CHASSMAN, an individual;

John McGuire, an individual, Defendants-Appellees,

Screen Actors Guild, Inc., a corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee.

No. 04-56179.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 6, 2006.

Filed September 26, 2007.

Marco Simons and Lauren Teukolsky, Hadsell & Stormer, Inc., Pasadena, CA, for the appellant.

Anne Richardson, Hadsell & Stormer, Inc., Pasadena, CA, for the appellant.

Rick Hicks, Hicks & Hicks, Beverly Hills, CA, for the appellant.

Eugenia…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Efrain Reynaga v. Roseburg Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Efrain Reynaga v. Roseburg Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API