Meek v. Baker
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an original action for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to hear and determine a petition for writ of error coram nobis alleged to have been filed with said court.
The writ of mandamus must be denied since the action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the party in interest. “It is legally impossible for an action of mandate to be prosecuted by one in his individual and personal capacity. The statute requires the State of Indiana to be included. This is not a mere nominal requirement; it is a statutory recognition of the fact that the State has…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Board of Public Safety v. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Casey v. MurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pitts v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Ketchum v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Casey v. MurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Hayes v. SCOTT COUNTY CT., ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Jackson v. State, Reeves, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.