Legal Opinion

Casey v. Murray

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1951No. O-196PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an original action whereby petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine an alleged petition for writ of error coram nobis hied by the relator in the trial court. Since the action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the petitioner, the issuance of the alternative writ is denied upon the authority of Meek v. Baker (1951), 229 Ind. 543, 99 N. E. 2d 426, decided this date.

Note.-—Reported in 99 N. E. 2d 426.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meek v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pitts v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Meek v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Hayes v. SCOTT COUNTY CT., ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Jackson v. State, Reeves, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Roberts v. BYRD, JUDGE OF WELLS CIRCUIT COURTIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API