Legal Opinion

Bates v. Flowers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 21, 1929No. 8 Div. 90PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoster, J.

This is a suit in equity for the sale of land for division in which two of the respondents deny the title of complainant and assert in themselves an adverse claim. An issue as to such claim was tried by a jury in accordance with section 6631 et seq., Code 1923. There was a verdict for the respondents claiming the title, and a decree of the court rendered for them upon the verdict. Complainants have secured a bill of exceptions, and seek to review and assign for error the action of the court separately in refusing two written charges to the jury as requested by them. The only questions…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Riggs v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Banks v. SpeersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Hays v. LemoineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Barber v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Robinson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harkins & Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Branford v. ShirleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Bearden v. OrrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API