Legal Opinion

Branford v. Shirley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 15, 1941No. 4 Div. 174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The averments of the bill as last amended are sufficiently stated on former appeal (Branford et als. v. Shirley, 238 Ala. 632, 193 So. 165), and need not be here repeated. Upon submission of the cause for final decree on pleadings and proof the court granted relief as to the thirty-five acres described in the deed of Calvin Dykes to his son, C. E. Dykes, dated September 15, '1913, the execution of which antedated Section 8046, Code 1923, Code 1940, Tit. 20, § 15.

■ As to this deed complainant insists the recitals therein of the agreement on the part of the grantee to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Russell v. CarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Hays v. LemoineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Hyman v. LangstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Ballenger v. BallengerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Taylor v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Marino v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Tate v. Water Works & Sewer Board of OxfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API