United States ex rel. Soby v. Johnson
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
McCARREY, District Judge.
In substance, this is an action by an individual painting subcontractor against the prime contractor under 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq.,. more popularly referred to as the “Miller Act”.
The case was tried before the court and with the pre-trial conference consumed 18 days, during which time some 90 exhibits were admitted, with myriads of some 110 sub-divisional exhibits, such as change orders, modifications, invoices, correspondence, etc., while 26 witnesses were called, a number of them being called several times.
The plaintiff entered into two sub-painting contracts…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McNeal-Edwards Co. v. Frank L. Young Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Gillis v. GilletteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hussmann Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- United States ex rel. Arlmont Air Condition Corp. v. Premier Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1968