People v. Prinzing
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman
After a bench trial, defendant, Robert S. Prinzing, was convicted of possessing child pornography (720 ILCS 5/11 — 20.1(a)(6) (West 2004)) and sentenced to 30 months’ probation. On appeal, he argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, which maintained that the police illegally obtained his consent to search, through the use of trickery, deceit, or subterfuge. Defendant alternatively argues that, even if his consent was valid, the evidence should have been suppressed because the police exceeded the scope of his consent. We agree that the police exceeded the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. FoskeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. JamesIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. KohlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- State v. B. MeffordMontana Supreme Court · 2022
- People v. KohlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012