Legal Opinion

De Youngs v. Jung

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 5, 1894Published

Appeal from special term. Action by De Youngs, a corporation, against Solomon Jung, doing business under the name of “The Youngs,” to restrain defendant from infringing the name and trade-mark of plaintiff, and from using the name “The Youngs” or “Youngs” in his business, and for damages. From an order granting an injunction, (25 N. Y. Supp. 479,) defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This is an appeal taken by the defendant from an injunction restraining him from using the words “The Young” or “The Youngs,” directly or indirectly, in connéction with the business of making or vending photographic art products in a way calculated or intended to convey the impression that such business is identical with plaintiff’s; also, the use of the name “Young” or “Youngs,” in script, with the prefix “The,” or one of like sound, and with or without a dash underneath, in connection with such *371business. “De Youngs” is the trade-mark of the plaintiff, an incorporated company organized under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Holmes, Booth & Atwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  3. Meneely v. . MeneelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Taendsticksfabriks Akticbolagat Vulcan v. MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Colman v. . CrumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API