Gitlitz v. Bitrate Productions
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Tatum Gitlitz, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01081-JAD-DJA 4 Plaintiff 5 v. Order Granting Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case 6 Bitrate Productions, [ECF No. 10] 7 Defendant 8 Tatum Gitlitz sues her former employer, Bitrate Productions, alleging that the company 9 forced her into a demoted position and cut her pay because she became pregnant. Bitrate moves 10 to compel arbitration, arguing that Gitlitz’s employment agreement contains a valid, broad 11 arbitration clause that encompasses her claims. Gitlitz opposes, contending that this clause…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.