Legal Opinion

Gitlitz v. Bitrate Productions

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 31, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01081Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Tatum Gitlitz, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01081-JAD-DJA 4 Plaintiff 5 v. Order Granting Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case 6 Bitrate Productions, [ECF No. 10] 7 Defendant 8 Tatum Gitlitz sues her former employer, Bitrate Productions, alleging that the company 9 forced her into a demoted position and cut her pay because she became pregnant. Bitrate moves 10 to compel arbitration, arguing that Gitlitz’s employment agreement contains a valid, broad 11 arbitration clause that encompasses her claims. Gitlitz opposes, contending that this clause…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API