Dennis W. Hoornstra v. United States of America, and the State of Illinois
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
In this interpleader action, the United States of America and the State of Illinois raise competing claims to the funds of an escrow account. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the United States. 764 F.Supp. 107. We reverse.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Malcolm Quick contracted to buy from the Southwest Mini Mart Corporation (“Mini Mart”) all the assets of a Mini Mart store in Aurora, Illinois. The purchase price was $50,000. Of this amount, $25,000 was allocated for the broker’s commission and the store’s past due rent. The remaining…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Pioneer American InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. SchroudCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bremen Bank and Trust Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Farmers State Bank v. NeeseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- United States v. Amos D. Davenport, Jr. And Norma L. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- In Re Handy Andy Home Improvement Centers, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Pansier v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.