Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kravontka

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1989No. 230PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered after appellant’s conviction by a jury on the charge of driving under the influence of alcohol, 75 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 3731(a)(1) and 3731(a)(4). Herein, the appellant, Thomas L. Kravontka, raises an issue which heretofore has not been expressly addressed by the courts of our Commonwealth: Whether admission of blood alcohol test results, pursuant to the business records exception to the hearsay rule, without the presence of the lab technician who performed the blood analysis violated his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Barton-MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Braun v. Target Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. LeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Judd v. State, Dept. of Transp. and DevelopmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. MelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API