Legal Opinion

United States v. Dunlap

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided April 15, 1983No. Misc. Dkt. No. 82-16PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioner seeks an order directing respondent to apply the correct standard of law and to deny the defense motion to suppress. Petitioner further seeks an immediate stay of proceedings pending resolution of its petition. We view the request as one seeking a writ of mandamus. The military judge’s decision in the case would have the effect of a dismissal. The petition is granted.

A writ of mandamus is available to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when the duty exists. Exceptional circumstances, amounting to a…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. LabellaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. WholleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. VargasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API