Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 1989No. Nos. 88-1944, 88-1945Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Stewart appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to relinquish jurisdiction, arguing: (1) that the sentencing court erred in retaining jurisdiction, pursuant to section 947.16(3), F.S. over the first third of his two pre-sentencing guidelines life sentences; and (2) that section 947.16(3), F.S. (1979) is unconstitutional.

We find appellant’s second argument to be without merit, noting that the Florida Supreme Court has ruled on this issue and found the retention of jurisdiction provisions of section 947.16(3)1 to be constitutional. Borden v. State, 402 So.2d 1176…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Borden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. State v. MobleySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Frazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API