Legal Opinion

Bremen Foundry & Machine Works v. McLendon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 3, 1917No. 8003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint; from Haralson superior court—Judge Bartlett. October 6, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

The petition in this ease was brought in the name of the “Bremen Foundry & Machine Works, by L. E. Bailey, owner and manager thereof.” The defendants interposed a.de*651murrer setting up that there was no proper or legal party plaintiff to the suit, as the name “Bremen Foundry & Machine Works, by L. E. Bailey, owner and manager thereof,” imported “neither a corporation, a partnership, or an individual.” The plaintiff offered an amendment to his petition, striking the words “L. E. Bailey, owner and manager thereof,” and inserting in lieu thereof the following words: “the same being.a trade name…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dalton Marble WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Charles v. Valdosta Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. FarkasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Johnson & Johnson Construction Co. v. Pioneer Neon Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Moody Air Force Base Federal Credit Union v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Newsom v. Reynolds Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Worth v. United Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API