Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. . Austin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action of ejectment to recover two tracts of land. The court submitted the following issues:

1. Are the plaintiffs the owners and entitled to the possession of the lands described in the complaint? Ans. Yes.

2. Was the defendant in the possession of the lands at the time this action was brought? Ans. Yes.

From the judgment rendered upon the verdict, the defendant appealed. The plaintiffs claim two tracts of land, containing five and one-half, and thirty-five acres, the former under certain deeds and the latter under a grant to William Mullis, dated 1822, and through mesne conveyances…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. . IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Duncan v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Hanstein v. . FerrallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Asheville Land Co. v. LangSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Gunter v. Whiting Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Hemphill v. MoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hardin v. WansleeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API