McCrossen v. Moorhead
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Hasbrouck, J.:
This case was before this court on a prior appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of the plaintiff's case upon the ground that the agency of the defendant’s daughter in driving the car had not been proved. (McCrossen v. Moorhead, 202 App. Div. 560.)
The court in its opinion on such appeal having stated the evidence in some detail determined that it, was sufficient to have justified the jury in finding the fact of agency. Substantially the same evidence on the agency of the daughter has been given on the second *498trial and upon that evidence we have no reason…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Ward v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Fallon v. . SwackhamerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Brillinger v. OziasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- McCrossen v. MoorheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- Albert v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936