Legal Opinion

McCrossen v. Moorhead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Van Kirk, J.:

At the end of the plaintiff’s case the court stated that the plaintiff had established a right to recover for negligence on the part of the driver of the automobile, but held that a nonsuit should be granted because the owner “ was not present and had nothing to do with it.” There was evidence which would have justified the jury in finding that the defendant was the owner of the car; he had purchased it for the use and pleasure of his family; that his daughter was authorized by him to drive the car and take out members of his family upon occasions when he was not present; that on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Fallon v. . SwackhamerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. McComb v. BoardmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCrossen v. MoorheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API