McCrossen v. Moorhead
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:
At the end of the plaintiff’s case the court stated that the plaintiff had established a right to recover for negligence on the part of the driver of the automobile, but held that a nonsuit should be granted because the owner “ was not present and had nothing to do with it.” There was evidence which would have justified the jury in finding that the defendant was the owner of the car; he had purchased it for the use and pleasure of his family; that his daughter was authorized by him to drive the car and take out members of his family upon occasions when he was not present; that on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Fallon v. . SwackhamerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- McComb v. BoardmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCrossen v. MoorheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923