Commonwealth v. Gallagher
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
1Opinion of the Court
DOWLING, J., Specially Presiding,
Defendant does not now question the sufficiency of the evidence1 to sustain his conviction of theft by failure to make required disposition of funds received2 and so the background can be sketched in with a broad brush.
It seems that Gallagher and one Santos were fellow inmates of the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill; defendant serving nine months to three years for theft charges and Santos one to three years for possession of drugs. Dysmas and Gestas became Damian and Pythias with the result that defendant, whose term was expiring, arranged to hire…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Crawley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- People v. SchenkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- State v. MellenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Commonwealth v. BruceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Com. v. Roncase, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020