Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Chrysler Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1975No. 55701, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The instant proceeding raises but one issue: whether the plaintiff gave timely notice of the injury to the defendant in accordance with § 381 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 In discussing the issue the parties have addressed themselves to three questions:(1) Whether the statutory period for notice in § 381 commences to run only after the employee has knowledge or reasonable grounds for knowl*363edge of the disability and after he discovers or should have discovered that the disability may be work-related, and if the above is true, did plaintiffs application filed with the Bureau of Workmen’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Finch v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Norris v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Jordon v. Michigan Malleable Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Tillotson v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Brown v. Revere Copper and Brass Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Robinson v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Smith v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Girlish v. Acme Precision Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ramos v. Production Steel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API