Lewis v. Chrysler Corporation
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The instant proceeding raises but one issue: whether the plaintiff gave timely notice of the injury to the defendant in accordance with § 381 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 In discussing the issue the parties have addressed themselves to three questions:(1) Whether the statutory period for notice in § 381 commences to run only after the employee has knowledge or reasonable grounds for knowl*363edge of the disability and after he discovers or should have discovered that the disability may be work-related, and if the above is true, did plaintiffs application filed with the Bureau of Workmen’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Finch v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Norris v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Jordon v. Michigan Malleable Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Tillotson v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Brown v. Revere Copper and Brass Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Robinson v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Smith v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Girlish v. Acme Precision Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Ramos v. Production Steel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.