Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Dahn

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1893No. 647PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Prom the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The sustaining of the demurrer to the appellants’ complaint is the only error relied upon. It is averred, in the complaint, that one Marsh was the contractor for the construction of a building for the appellee;, that on the 2d day of Eebruary, 1891, appellants furnished lumber and material to Marsh for said building, and that the same was used by Marsh in the construction .thereof, and that appellants, within the prescribed time, filed in the recorder’s office, a notice of intention to hold a lien on said appellee’s property for the materials furnished said Marsh in building the same for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Longlois v. LongloisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Goodbub v. Estate of HornungIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Caylor v. ThornIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Parker v. DillinghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Sosat v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garneau v. Port Blakely Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Brandon v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Specter v. Kimball & Cobb Stone Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Beaver v. WilkinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API