Legal Opinion

PAZANDEH

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1989No. ID 3100PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3100 MAI 1.6R OF PAZANDEH In Visa Petition Proceedings A-28451555 Decided by Board April 6, 1989 (1) In visa petition appeals involving section 204(aX2XA) of the Immigration and Na- tionality Act,

8 U.S.C. § 1154

(aX2XA) (1988), the Board will not review the, issue of the bona fides of the petitioner's prior marriage if 5 years have elapsed since the petitioner obtained her lawful permanent residence. (2) Where the visa petition was initially approvablo subject to the petitinner'ss meet- ing a burden which has lapsed with the passage of time, the majority finds the rationale…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. BARDOUILLEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981
  2. ATEMBEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ACEIJAS-QUIROZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
  2. Brinklys v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
  3. Liu v. LynchDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  4. Bouarfa v. MayorkasDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  5. Michael Bitton v. UscisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API