Legal Opinion

People v. Nichols

California Court of Appeal, 6th District

Decided February 3, 2016No. H041979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBamattre-Manoukian, J.

*685I. INTRODUCTION

In August 2012 defendant Daniel Lawrence Nichols pleaded no contest to the felony offense of buying or receiving a stolen motor vehicle with a prior conviction for vehicle theft (Pen.Code, §§ 496d, 666.5 ),1 and admitted the allegation that he had one prior violent or serious felony conviction that also qualified as a strike within the meaning of the Three Strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12). The trial court imposed a term of four years in the state prison.

In November 2014 defendant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which the trial court treated as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Johnson v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. Superior Court (Pearson)California Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. VarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. Williams, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. VarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API