Legal Opinion

Yancey v. Hernandez-Pinero

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stephen G. Crane, J.

This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding in which petitioner Samuel Yancey seeks: (1) an order annulling and setting aside as an error of law, arbitrary and capricious, and an abuse of discretion, the determination of respondents Sally HernandezPinero and the New York City Housing Authority (hereinafter referred to as NYCHA or respondents) finding petitioner ineligible for admission to public housing; and (2) a judgment finding petitioner eligible for tenancy in public housing on a "Priority I” basis.

Petitioner is 53 years old and has been disabled and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York State Ass'n of Counties v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Parker v. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Lentlie v. EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Lentlie v. EganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Giambra v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. De Maria v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. L.A.M. Recovery v. Department of Consumer AffairsNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Decker v. Broome County Co-operative Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Almeida v. HernandezNew York Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API