Downs v. Scott
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Flood, J.,
The defendant asks a new trial for three reasons: (1) the court below abused its discretion in refusing the defendant’s request to withdraw his waiver of jury trial, (2) the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and (3) the damages awarded were excessive.
1. A waiver of jury trial was endorsed upon the plaintiff’s complaint. In such case, if the defendant desires a jury trial, Rule 1025* (b) of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County requires him to endorse a demand for a jury trial upon his answer or Ms praecipe for appearance. The defendant’s praecipe…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohen v. SykesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Ondick v. OndickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Rennekamp Supply Co. v. ValicentiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Warden v. ZanellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Stathas v. Wade EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Eighth North-Val, Inc. v. William L. Parkinson, D.D.S., P.C., Pension TrustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- McFarlane v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.