Stites v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Appeal from County -Court; Woods County; W. M. Bicleel, Judge. Pete Stites was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
The plaintiff in. error, Pete Stites, was convicted at the October, 1911, term of the county court of Woods county on a charge of unlawfully conveying from one place within Woods county to another place therein intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and imprisonment in the- county jail for a period of 30 days.
This conviction would be affirmed were it not for the fact that the trial judge left the courtroom, during the progress of the trial, retired to the clerk’s office, and was there transacting other business. The statement in the record over the signature of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Slaughter v. United StatesCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1904
3Cited by10 opinions
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ridenour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
- Sargent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- State v. DarrowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.