Legal Opinion

Thrasher v. Moran

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1905No. S.F. No. 3235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This is an appeal from a default judgment of foreclosure on the judgment-roll without a bill of exceptions.

It is claimed that the prayer of the complaint did not ask for attorney’s fees, and that as the relief granted against a defendant by default cannot exceed that prayed for in the complaint, the judgment is erroneous as to attorney’s fees. The law is as stated by appellant, and the question is as to whether or not the complaint in effect did pray for attorney’s fees. As a copy of the complaint with a copy of the summons was served upon appellant, he must be held to have had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alexander v. McDowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Rapp v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Monroe v. FohlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Carriere v. MinturnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  5. O'Neal v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huber v. ShedoudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Blayden v. MorrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Linn v. WeinraubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API