Legal Opinion

Heath v. Consumer Protection

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 27, 2023No. 20210362-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

2023 UT App 45

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MICHAEL DANIEL HEATH, HEATH ENTERPRISE, INC. AND HEATH ENTERPRISES UTAH, INC., Appellants, v. DIVISION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Appellees. Opinion No. 20210362-CA Filed April 27, 2023 Fifth District Court, Cedar City Department The Honorable Matthew L. Bell No. 170500129 James W. Jensen, Attorney for Appellants Sean D. Reyes and Stanford E. Purser, Attorneys for Appellees JUDGE MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES DAVID N. MORTENSEN and RYAN M. HARRIS concurred. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, Judge: ¶1…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Coleman Ex Rel. Schefski v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Fort Pierce Industrial Park Phases II, III, & IV Owners Ass'n v. ShakespeareUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Utah Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Air Quality BoardUtah Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API