Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Collins

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 6, 2003No. CIV.A. 101CV1266-CAPPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PANNELL, District Judge.

This matter is now before the court on various motions filed by both parties. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 29-1] is GRANTED as to the federal claim, and the plaintiffs motion to strike declarations [Doc. No. 44-1] is DENIED as moot. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Those claims are dismissed without prejudice.

Additionally, the plaintiffs motion to extent time to respond to the summary judgment motion [Doc. No. 32-1] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc, and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Action Outdoor Advertising II, LLC v. Lumpkin CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
  2. Gideon v. CamusDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024
  3. Law v. LabatDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022
  4. Wells v. City of Birmingham Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API