Legal Opinion

Mertens v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 15, 1987No. 71-86TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This tax refund case is currently before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that this Court lacks jurisdiction. For the reasons discussed herein, defendant’s motion is granted and the complaint is to be dismissed.

Facts

The plaintiffs seek recovery of some $3,3001 in federal income taxes paid by them for tax years 1976 through 1979. Joint federal income tax returns were filed on or about the fourteenth day of April following the close of each tax year at issue.2 On January 4, 1984, the plaintiffs *679filed amended tax returns for each of the above years…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Decca Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. Kaltreider Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rohmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  2. Chicago Milwaukee Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Bmw (Us) Holding Corporation and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API