Legal Opinion
Baldwin Rubber Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1939No. 8124PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellant-licensee, the Baldwin Rubber Company, appeals from a judgment of $101,491.54, in favor of appelleelicensor, The Paine & Williams Company, for royalties alleged to be due on the manufacture of automobile rubber floor covering and methods of, and apparatus for, making such coverings. The issues are whether the product manufactured and sold by appellee was covered by the license and whether the license is void because of price fixing.
On March 18, 1933, William S. Vrooman filed in the Patent Office an application, No. 661,453, for United States Letters Patent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Noonan v. Chester Park Athletic Club Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Watson Bros. Transp. Co. v. JaffaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Stubnitz-Greene Spring Corp. v. Fort Pitt Bedding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Blanc v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Buckingham Products Co. v. McAleer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.