Conrod v. Missouri State Highway Patrol
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Presiding Judge.
By his petition in three counts, each alleging a different theory of recovery, plaintiff Earnest Conrod, Jr., sought a judgment against the Missouri State Highway Patrol and Roger B. Davis, as a member of the Missouri State Highway Patrol, for $10,750. In general, the petition was based upon the alleged illegal seizure of that amount of currency from the plaintiff. The trial court entered a summary judgment for that amount against the Missouri State Highway Patrol. The Missouri State Highway Patrol appealed. The appeal was, by order of this Court, held in abeyance…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frank Hale Bennett v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Eighty-Eight Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars, Appeal of Robert B. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. ONE 1976 BUICK SKYLARK, ETC.District Court, D. Colorado · 1978
- Parker v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Terry L. Madewell v. Mike Downs, Anthony P. Grootens, and John PrineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Twelve Thousand, Three Hundred Ninety Dollars ($12,390.00), Willie J. Dorsey, Jr., Idell Dorsey, and Laverne HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Bryan v. Missouri State Highway PatrolMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Edney v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- Browning Ex Rel. Browning v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.