Legal Opinion

United States v. Sergio Duran Badilla

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2004No. 03-2183PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant-appellant Sergio Duran Ba-dilla was indicted for knowingly and intentionally possessing more than one hundred kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Badilla was found guilty after a jury trial. He was sentenced to seventy-eight months’ imprisonment and four years’ supervised release.

Badilla appeals both his conviction and sentence. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), this court affirms Badilla’s conviction and sentence.

II.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. GwathneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. United States v. Maldonado-RamiresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Andres Sanchez-CruzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API