Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.

This is an application by the defendant and third-party plaintiff “ for a protective order as provided in Section 3103 of the Civil Practice Law and Buies, to the effect that defendant, wilmod company, inc., not be required to answer the questions in the ‘ Notice to Admit ’ as such questions do not relate to this law suit ”.

CPLR 3103, under which the defendant makes this application, provides for the making of a “ protective order denying, limiting, conditioning or regulating the use of any disclosure device ’ ’ when it is necessary “to prevent unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Langan v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. Langan v. First Trust Deposit CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nader v. General Motors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Constantino v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API