Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kuhnel v. Russell (In Re Kuhnel)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2006No. BAP No. WY-06-022, Bankruptcy No. 05-21304Published

1Dissent

MICHAEL, Bankruptcy Judge,

Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion appears to be based upon the following conclusions: (1) application of the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in In re Duncan to the facts at bar is inappropriate; (2) the fact that Toyota voluntarily released its lien defeats the automatic lien preservation provisions of § 551; and (3) in order to preserve any claim she might have had to the vehicle, the trustee was required to file an objection to the Debtors’ claim of exemption within 30 days of the first meeting of creditors…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re John L. Glass, Debtor. John L. Glass v. Michael Hitt, Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Hitt v. Glass (In Re Glass)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Zubrod v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Hynes v. Energy West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API