Legal Opinion
Peters v. Winco Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 2005No. Nos. 03-17404, 04-15972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Jo Ann Peters appeals the judgment of the district court. We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we will not recount it here.
I
The district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting a site inspection discovery request to the inspection of sites relevant to the claims alleged in the plaintiffs complaint. See Rutledge v. Elec. Hose & Rubber Co., 511 F.2d 668 (9th Cir.1975) (“[t]he function of a plaintiffs discovery is to secure evidence in support of his claims,”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 26, Advisory Committee Notes (2000…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robin Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rick Summers v. A. Teichert & Son, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- M. D. Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2006
- Watson v. County of YavapaiDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- DEBOARD v. UNION AT CRESCENT, LPDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- Fisher v. Urban Salt Lake HotelDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020