Robinovitz v. Hamill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Brror from County Court, Creek County; Action by Max Robinovitz against J. G. Hamill on a promissory note and an open account. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HARRISON, C.
Max Robinovitz was engaged in the business of furnishing supplies for oil wells and well drilling outfits under .the name of the Producers’ Supply Company. The defendant owed plaintiff $125 on a promissory note and $30.63 on an open account for supplies purchased by defendant from plaintiff, all of which defendant refused to pay. Plaintiff sued defendant on the note and account. At the close of the testimony defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff’s action on the ground that plaintiff was doing business under a fictitious name, to wit, the Producers’ Supply Company, and,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baumeister v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Roberts v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Graham v. EisznerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Katterhenry v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Smith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- General American Oil Co. v. Wagoner Oil Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Alco Finance Co. v. MoranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.