Legal Opinion

State Banking Board v. Goose Creek State Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1927No. 3375Published

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The appellants’ propositions in effect present the point that the special circumstances of the present ease do not constitute “a deposit” within the purview of the Bank Deposit Guaranty Act, and on that account the claim of the appellee bank is not entitled to the protection of the act. The facts found by the court can be summed up in order to give effect to the real dealing between the two banks. The appellee hank, through its cashier, upon the solicitation of the cashier of the Shepherd State Bank, consented to place on interest in the latter bank $5,000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State Banking Board v. PilcherTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Turkey State Bank v. Estelline State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Chapman v. Southwest Nat. Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API