Legal Opinion

Bernhand v. Ennis

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided September 20, 1927No. 86PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rice, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The justice’s transcript affirmatively states that the service of the constable was verified by the oath of the constable in writing, but the signature of the affiant and the name of the person before whom the oath was taken do not appear in the copy of the oath printed on the back of the summons and filed with the transcript.

In view óf the affirmative statement in the record that the affidavit was made, the first exception can be disposed of and overruled upon the authority of Brown v. Butterworth, 5 Penn. 151, 58 A. 1041, and Slivka v. Mroczka, 3…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  2. Robson v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Billingsley v. Wilckens, Staats & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1909
  4. Brown v. C. H. Butterworth & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Appeal of CeresiniSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
  2. Clough v. Superior Equipment Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  3. Chambers v. Fennemore's Adm'r.Superior Court of Delaware · 1846
  4. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API