Legal Opinion
Burger v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 20, 2025No. 1:24-cv-02083Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KEITH BURGER, et al., ) CASE NO. 1:24-cv-2083 ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE CHARLES E. FLEMING ) v. ) ) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER Defendant. ) ) Before the Court is Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.’s (“CSX”) motion to partially dismiss the amended complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”). (ECF No. 139). Plaintiff Adam Dallas has filed a timely opposition. (ECF No. 143). CSX filed a timely reply in support of its motion. (ECF No. 147). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. I.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Randy BIBBO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.