Legal Opinion

McEwan Bros. & Co. v. Carpenter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Bay; Maxwell, J. Replevin by McEwan Brothers & Company against Alice M. Carpenter and another. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff is a corporation doing a lumber and sawmill business at Bay City. In May, 1895, it made a contract with Alvin Maltby, the effect of which was to give it the ownership of one-half of a quantity of Norway logs. One of its reasons for making the contract was to keep its mill employed. The logs were to be cut and delivered by Maltby, and were to be sawed by the plaintiff. Maltby did not deliver the logs fast enough to keep the mill running, and the mill was shut down for a little time. While the mill was idle, the booms were filled with other logs, so that there was no room for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. River Rouge Savings Bank v. S & M Building Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Germain v. Central Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API