Legal Opinion
River Rouge Savings Bank v. S & M Building Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1960No. Docket 32-35, Calendar 47,882-47,885PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
Sometime prior to 1956 the S & M Building Company, a Michigan corporation, was organized to engage in certain residential building projects. This company in connection with certain other building or construction companies, namely, Victor Building Company, Gilbert Contraction Company, and LeBlanc Construction Company — which were directly controlled and entirely owned by S & M Building Company — commenced a residential building project embracing some 75 homes in the city of Marysville, Michigan.
The appellees, Raymond Excavating Company and Kerr Lumber Company, were retained by the building…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. AcriSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wallich Lumber Co. v. GoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Old Kent Bank v. Whitaker Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Williams & Works, Inc. v. Springfield Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- First National Bank of Chippewa Falls v. Charles Henneman Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- P. H. I. Construction Co. v. Riverview Commons AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.