Legal Opinion

Aquino v. Riegelman

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for a peremptory writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This is an application arising upon an order to show cause why a writ of peremptory mandamus, directed to the president of the borough of Brooklyn and to the commissioner of highways of the borough, should not be issued to compel the commissioner of highways to return forthwith certain property of the relator which was removed by the commissioner of highways on June 11, 1918, from West Thirty-seventh street, Coney Island, and to cancel a bill for the expense incurred in such removal and the storage charges thereon, and why the respondents should not be compelled to refrain from interfering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Brookhaven v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. People v. . Steeplechase Park Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Matter of HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. People v. Steeplechase Park Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. Steeplechase Park Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Capune v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API