Legal Opinion

In Re Acosta

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 12, 1995No. Bankruptcy B-94-06243-PHX-RGMPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE TRUSTEE’S SALE

ROBERT G. MOOREMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Debtors’ Motion to Set Aside Trustee’s Sale and Fleet Mortgage Corporation’s response thereto. A hearing was held March 24,1995. The Court directed the Chapter 13 Trustee to meet with the Debtors and supplement his response within 15 days. The Chapter 13 Trustee filed his Supplemental Response on April 3, 1995, noting that an amended plan was required to be filed by the Debtors before confirmation. The matter was taken under advisement thereafter.

After…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Tome v. Baer (In Re Tome)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Worthy v. World Wide Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Lomagno v. Salomon Bros. Realty Corp. (Lomagno)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Nicholson v. Nagel (In Re Nagel)District Court, D. Arizona · 1999
  4. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1995
  5. In Re StoberUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API