Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ardmore Farms v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 20, 1987No. BN-119Published

1ConcurrenceZehmer, Judge

(specially concurring).

I fully concur in the majority opinion, and write only to clarify the apparent confusion regarding apportionment of wage-loss benefits between carriers responsible for separate compensable injuries which jointly cause a present temporary partial disability. Although temporary benefits may not be apportioned as. between the carrier and the claimant, such benefits are apportionable as between two carriers if two separate compensable injuries jointly contribute to the disability. Hayward Trucking, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 466 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Flagship…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flagship National Bank of Broward County v. HinkleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Hayward Trucking v. Aetna Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Deseret Ranches v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API